From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1NXBwJ-0002iS-Bl for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:08:03 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXBwH-0002hW-17 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:08:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXBwB-0002eu-Oj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:07:59 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60193 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXBwB-0002eh-9v for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:07:55 -0500 Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.140]:45296) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NXBwA-0001vg-Ry for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:07:55 -0500 Received: from [82.69.40.219] (helo=riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NXBw9-00069q-Rc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:07:54 +0000 Received: from cjwatson by riva.pelham.vpn.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) for grub-devel@gnu.org id 1NXBw9-0005ll-00; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:07:53 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:07:53 +0000 From: Colin Watson To: The development of GNU GRUB Message-ID: <20100119110753.GA5847@riva.ucam.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [82.69.40.219] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: fb rotation merge directive X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:08:01 -0000 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:57:00AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > As the patches were against r1782 and unlike git the bzr workflow does > not seem to offer a rebase this is probably as good as the format > gets. https://launchpad.net/bzr-rewrite As with git, it's unwise to use it on branches that have already been published, but it's fine to use it for private patch submission branches. (Otherwise, you can just use 'bzr merge', of course.) -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]