From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" Subject: Re: RFC: NUMA modifications to cyclictest Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:23:35 +0300 Message-ID: <201001201223.36670@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> References: <20100119171439.24726f2e@torg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: RT Return-path: Received: from gate.lvk.cs.msu.su ([158.250.17.1]:53214 "EHLO mail.lvk.cs.msu.su" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807Ab0ATJXj (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:23:39 -0500 Received: from mail.lvk.cs.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lvk.cs.msu.su (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207A1974 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:23:37 +0300 (MSK) Received: from desktopvm.lvknet (desktopvm.lvknet [192.168.132.1]) by mail.lvk.cs.msu.su (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF21950 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:23:37 +0300 (MSK) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > The big difference here is that when using --numa, each measurement > > thread (one per cpu) has it's stack allocated from the memory node > > associated with it's cpu. Also, the major data structures for each > > thread (parameter block, statistics block and histogram) are allocated > > from the appropriate node. This is done with calls into libnuma, > > which means this will add a dependency on libnuma. > > That might cause some trouble for embedded folks. :( Maybe make that a compile-time option?