[PATCH 0 of 10] LVM: mirrored/redundant/duplicate mirror log

[malahal@us.ibm.com <malahal@us.ibm.com>]

Takahiro Yasui [tyasui at redhat.com] wrote:
> On 01/19/10 21:21, Jonathan Brassow wrote:
> > I found a bug in the previous patches that were disrupting the workings
> > of 'lvconvert --repair'.  I was not properly grabbing the first item of
> > a list (and checking for NULL).
> > 
> > I am also having some mysterious trouble running the testsuite.  I am
> > getting different results between identical runs.  I'm not sure if I
> > have some old dmeventd running or what...
> > 
> > Also, people are unhappy with "redundant" as the name of the log type.
> > Other suggestions?  "mirrored"?  "duplicated"?
> 
> "reduntant" is used such as by "redundant system," and familiar key word
> to me. Otherwise, how about "dual-disk"? It will work for two disks.
> Or "multi-disk" for more than two disks?

I like 'mirrored'.  If not 'mirrored', I would go with 'multidisk'

Thanks, Malahal.