From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, UV: Fix RTC latency bug by reading replicated cachelines
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:40:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100122154006.GA4975@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100120081020.GG20621@elte.hu>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:10:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > +++ linux/drivers/char/uv_mmtimer.c 2010-01-14 11:56:57.000000000 -0600
> > @@ -89,12 +89,19 @@ static long uv_mmtimer_ioctl(struct file
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case MMTIMER_GETOFFSET: /* offset of the counter */
> > /*
> > - * UV RTC register is on its own page
> > + * Starting with HUB rev 2.0, the UV RTC register is
> > + * replicated across all cachelines of it's own page.
> > + * This allows faster simultaneous reads from a given socket.
> > + *
> > + * The offset returned is in 64 bit units.
> > */
> > - if (PAGE_SIZE <= (1 << 16))
> > - ret = ((UV_LOCAL_MMR_BASE | UVH_RTC) & (PAGE_SIZE-1))
> > - / 8;
> > - else
> > + if (PAGE_SIZE <= (1 << 16)) {
> > + if (uv_get_min_hub_revision_id() == 1)
> > + ret = 0;
> > + else
> > + ret = ((uv_blade_processor_id() *
> > + L1_CACHE_BYTES) % PAGE_SIZE) / 8;
> > + } else
>
> That 64K PAGE_SIZE check in the ioctl looks rather weird. What is the purpose
> of it?
Checking for > 64k pages is really a holdover from similar code on ia64. I've taken it out with a modified version of this patch that I'll send shortly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 21:09 [PATCH] x86, UV: Add function retrieving node controller revision number Jack Steiner
2010-01-13 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-14 18:34 ` [PATCH] x86, UV: Read RTC using replicated cachelines Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-19 14:41 ` [PATCH] x86, UV: Fix RTC latency bug by reading " Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-20 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-22 15:40 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2010-01-22 15:41 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-27 13:17 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-15 19:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, uv: Add function retrieving node controller revision number tip-bot for Jack Steiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100122154006.GA4975@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.