From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Ozan Çağlayan" <ozan@pardus.org.tr>,
"Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] RFC: deprecate CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG and schedule it for rapid removal
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:20:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100123012002.GA8655@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5A4B44.3010002@zytor.com>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:05:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/22/2010 04:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Would it not be better to fix that problem (perhaps just with the
> > revert) so that 2.6.33, 2.6.32.x and earlier can be fixed? Then we can
> > nuke the feature in 2.6.34.
> >
> > Alternatively, we can nuke the feature from 2.6.33 and 2.6.32.x and
> > earlier right now. Where "nuke" might mean "make it difficult to
> > enable".
> >
> > Whatever. Bottom line is that it'd be nice to do something to fix up
> > 2.6.33 and earlier.
> >
>
> I would be all for nuking the feature immediately. The easiest way to
> nuke the feature quickly is to make it a noninteractive Kconfig feature.
>
> All in favor?
/me raises his hand.
A Kconfig change would be nice to have.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-23 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-13 18:51 Boot hangs after "Freeing initrd memory" with 2.6.31.11 Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-14 6:58 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-14 7:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-14 7:48 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-14 10:35 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-14 13:08 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-14 13:36 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-16 12:28 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-16 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 8:43 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-17 13:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 9:22 ` Ozan Çağlayan
2010-01-17 13:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18 1:26 ` RFC: deprecate CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG and schedule it for rapid removal H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-18 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-23 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-23 1:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-23 1:20 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-01-23 1:51 ` [stable] " H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-23 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-23 5:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-18 0:58 ` Boot hangs after "Freeing initrd memory" with 2.6.31.11 H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100123012002.GA8655@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ozan@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.