From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001242004.22778.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100124001815.48b4eb9c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I've been testing this patch for over a week and haven't seen a single problem
> > related to it during this time.
> >
> > Are there any objections to it?
>
> Usual question 8) - explain the locking. What happens if we suspend as
> kms is initialising/being removed.
Nothing extremely interesting AFAICS. There's no X yet or it's already exited,
so we don't need a VT switch anyway.
> Also what happens if you have KMS and non KMS consoles both active
> through the frame buffer off different cards ?
That's more interesting. In fact I didn't take that into consideration. :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-24 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-23 23:55 [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-24 0:18 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-24 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-01-24 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-24 0:18 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-25 17:22 ` Eric Anholt
2010-01-25 17:22 ` Eric Anholt
2010-01-25 18:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-25 18:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-25 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-25 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-25 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 21:27 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-25 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-25 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-26 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-26 14:58 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-26 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-26 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 22:08 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 23:07 ` [linux-pm] " Stefan Seyfried
2010-01-31 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-03 14:24 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-02-03 14:24 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-01-31 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 23:07 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-01-26 14:58 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 21:27 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-25 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-25 18:43 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-23 23:55 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001242004.22778.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.