From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Official policy to list checksums
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:56:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100125015636.GA9855@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hjh7f3$6v0$2@ger.gmane.org>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:29:56AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 24-01-10 08:06, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:06:13PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >> does [1] still describe the official policy to add checksums? Or is
> >
> > No
> >
> >> putting them into the recipes preferred nowadays?
> >
> > Yes
>
> I think not! The new format:
>
> * is not documented
I think there were plenty of emails describing the new format. Need to put it
all in a Wiki page, agree.
> * it has no tools to autogenerate it
Give me few minutes - I'll send something to address this point.
> * has not been agreed on in any way.
Actually, specifying checksums in corresponding recipes was agreed on during
the OEDEM in November. Using additional variable flags in base.bbclass was
added by Phil, since bitbake cannot handle SHA256 sums in SRC_URI. Although,
Richard mentioned he'd like to get it implemented in bitbake at some point:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.bitbake.devel/1089/focus=1115
> As an experiment I tried to use it for a branch at work and I
> *absolutely* hate the workflow needed for the new format.
You should have warned me! :) I thought you completely switched to the new
method and liked it... :)
--
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-23 20:06 Official policy to list checksums Paul Menzel
2010-01-24 7:06 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-24 10:29 ` Koen Kooi
2010-01-24 11:08 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-01-24 11:13 ` Koen Kooi
2010-01-24 11:25 ` Paul Menzel
2010-01-25 1:56 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2010-01-25 1:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] simplify switch to new SRC_URI-based checksums Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-25 1:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] base.bbclass: pre-create SRC_URI checksums to include in the recipe Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-25 7:17 ` Khem Raj
2010-01-25 7:19 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-01-25 1:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass: don't pre-generate checksums.ini entries any longer Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-25 7:18 ` Khem Raj
2010-01-25 7:24 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-01-25 8:00 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-25 7:24 ` Official policy to list checksums Khem Raj
2010-01-25 8:19 ` Koen Kooi
2010-01-25 8:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-01-25 8:52 ` Graeme Gregory
2010-01-27 22:09 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2010-02-21 10:37 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-01-25 9:55 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100125015636.GA9855@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.