From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC v2] non-blocking flash write/erase/status check functions
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:35:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001250935.08840.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100122120340.7FAB53F6C0@gemini.denx.de>
On Friday 22 January 2010 13:03:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > More tightly integrated non-blocking variants of some CFI flash access
> > > functions. Enable with CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_CFI_NONBLOCK
> > > These can be useful to erase flash or write complete sectors of flash
> > > during a serial data transfer for software updates.
> >
> > The first version had a strong NACK by Wolfgang Denk because of
> > code duplication. Does this version have a chance for inclusion,
> > or are there other things I have to fix/change to get it to this
> > stage?
>
> The patch is still pretty intrusive - the resulting code is much
> harder to read, to understand and to debug (in both configurations).
>
> From my point of view the disadvantages compared to the advantages
> (and the potential number of users of this new feature) don't justify
> to apply this patch.
>
>
> Stefan, what do you think?
I have the same feeling. Even though Wolfgang Wegner has put bigger effort
into making this less intrusive, it still makes the CFI driver even more
complex and less readable.
So I tend to not pull this patch (Sorry Wolfgang).
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 12:51 [U-Boot] non-blocking flash functions - is this possible/acceptable? Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-27 13:21 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 14:03 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 15:22 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-27 15:57 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-10-27 15:24 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-27 18:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-10-30 14:48 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Implementation of non-blocking flash write/erase/status check functions Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-30 15:02 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2009-10-30 18:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-11-02 16:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Wolfgang Wegner
2009-11-02 16:33 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Implementation of " Wolfgang Wegner
2009-12-09 16:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC v2] " Wolfgang Wegner
2010-01-22 10:03 ` Wolfgang Wegner
2010-01-22 12:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-01-25 8:35 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001250935.08840.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.