From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:37:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126153759.GF4431@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100126162515.230bdf36@hyperion.delvare>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]
> So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus
> drivers to a separate sub-directory.
And with the PCA9xxx-controllers? The ISA-driver into non-embedded and the
platform-driver into embedded? Hmmm...
And (in 80 years ;)) there might be just one I2C-maintainer taking care of them
all? Then, why the split?
I am all for taking the embedded-burden away from you, just I am not too fond
of this idea.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 9:20 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <1264411234-5400-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100125111055.05ccedf2-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 15:37 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20100126153759.GF4431-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 16:34 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 16:34 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-01 10:38 [PATCH 3/3] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100301113840.4d6b4e7d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-01 11:12 ` [PATCH] " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-01 11:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <1267441936-4432-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-22 21:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-22 21:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100126153759.GF4431@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.