From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:27:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126162730.GI19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264519015.3789.28.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:16:55AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> --- security-testing-2.6.orig/init/main.c
> +++ security-testing-2.6/init/main.c
> @@ -663,9 +663,9 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> proc_caches_init();
> buffer_init();
> key_init();
> + radix_tree_init();
> security_init();
> vfs_caches_init(totalram_pages);
> - radix_tree_init();
> signals_init();
> /* rootfs populating might need page-writeback */
> page_writeback_init();
FWIW, I'd take radix_tree_init() much earlier than that; it's a common
infrastructure and if we have it early it'll mean less headache.
AFAICS, it can go right after mm_init(). Objections, anyone?
Other than that, I'm OK with that one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-26 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 20:35 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters Mimi Zohar
2010-01-20 20:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 " Mimi Zohar
2010-01-23 23:07 ` Al Viro
2010-01-25 19:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-01-25 21:30 ` Al Viro
2010-01-26 13:03 ` Al Viro
2010-01-26 15:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-01-26 16:27 ` Al Viro [this message]
[not found] ` <1264520125.3789.32.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20100126163143.GJ19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <1264528747.3062.11.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
2010-01-26 19:41 ` Open Intents, lookup_instantiate_filp() And All That Shit(tm) Al Viro
2010-01-26 22:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters Mimi Zohar
2010-01-20 20:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Fix 2 " Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100126162730.GI19799@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.