From: jamie@shareable.org (Jamie Lokier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors (v4)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:52:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128145205.GB24679@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264685461.7064.65.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:07 +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > The SWP instruction was deprecated in the ARMv6 architecture, superseded
> > by the LDREX/STREX family of instructions for
> > load-linked/store-conditional operations. The ARMv7 multiprocessing
> > extensions mandate that SWP/SWPB instructions are treated as undefined
> > from reset, with the ability to enable them through the System Control
> > Register SW bit.
> >
> > This patch adds the alternative solution to emulate the SWP and SWPB
> > instructions using LDREX/STREX sequences, and log statistics to
> > /proc/cpu/swp_emulation. To correctly deal with copy-on-write, it also
> > modifies cpu_v7_set_pte_ext to change the mappings to priviliged RO when
> > user RO.
>
> Just a thought - could we not add another kuser helper in the vectors
> page that does this? Your exception trapping code would set regs->ARM_lr
> to the next instruction following SWP and regs->ARM_pc to the helper.
That would corrupt LR seen by userspace, wouldn't it?
Userspace assumes SWP/SWPB do not change LR.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 13:07 [PATCH] ARM: Add SWP/SWPB emulation for ARMv7 processors (v4) Leif Lindholm
2010-01-28 13:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-01-28 14:52 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-01-28 15:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100128145205.GB24679@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.