From: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>,
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFH] rpm packaging failure
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:46:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100131234607.GB10914@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100131231430.GA10914@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 03:14:32PM -0800, David Aguilar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:22:03PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> writes:
> >
> > > Not shipping them if they aren't yet used/needed for anything other
> > > than folks working on remote helpers seems reasonable and the rm in
> > > the spec file should do the trick nicely.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > To allow us to go forward a bit easier, I am planning to use the attached,
> > as we would need some parts of it when we do start generating a separate
> > package, I think.
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] RPM packaging: don't include foreign-scm-helper bits yet
> >
> > The files in /usr/lib/python* are only the support infrastructure for
> > foreign scm interface yet to be written and/or shipped with git. Don't
> > include them in the binary package (this will also free us from Python
> > dependency).
> >
> > When we ship with foreign scm interface, we will need to package these
> > files with it in a separate subpackage, but we are not there yet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> > ---
> > git.spec.in | 5 +++++
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> Apologies for the late response to this thread.
>
> Would it be simpler to define NO_PYTHON when running make?
> We can always resurrect %python_sitelib when it is needed.
>
> Here's what that looks like relative to master.
I see you just pushed out a new master with the %define changes.
Here's a rebased patch just in case.
-- >8 --
From ac09b94c332564cc7dde3c2f8961990098b5d4a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:52:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] RPM packaging: Define NO_PYTHON to avoid Python dependency
We don't use the Python bits yet so we shouldn't require python
to build. The %define used python to calculate %python_sitelib
and thus incurred a build-time python dependency without
specifying python in BuildRequires.
Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
---
git.spec.in | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git.spec.in b/git.spec.in
index ee74a5e..320829a 100644
--- a/git.spec.in
+++ b/git.spec.in
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Error)
Perl interface to Git
%define path_settings ETC_GITCONFIG=/etc/gitconfig prefix=%{_prefix} mandir=%{_mandir} htmldir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
-%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
%prep
%setup -q
@@ -106,14 +105,15 @@ Perl interface to Git
%build
make %{_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \
%{path_settings} \
+ NO_PYTHON=NotYet \
all %{!?_without_docs: doc}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make %{_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
%{path_settings} \
+ NO_PYTHON=NotYet \
INSTALLDIRS=vendor install %{!?_without_docs: install-doc}
-test ! -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} || rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -exec rm -f {} ';'
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name perllocal.pod -exec rm -f {} ';'
@@ -192,6 +192,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
# No files for you!
%changelog
+* Sun Jan 31 2010 David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
+- Define NO_PYTHON until we actually need the Python bits.
+
* Sun Jan 31 2010 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Do not use %define inside %{!?...} construct.
--
1.7.0.rc1.7.gc0da5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-31 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-30 9:24 [RFH] rpm packaging failure Junio C Hamano
2010-01-30 15:19 ` Todd Zullinger
2010-01-30 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-30 19:47 ` Todd Zullinger
2010-01-30 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-31 4:12 ` Todd Zullinger
2010-01-31 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-31 23:14 ` David Aguilar
2010-01-31 23:46 ` David Aguilar [this message]
2010-01-31 0:06 ` Johan Herland
2010-01-31 0:56 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100131234607.GB10914@gmail.com \
--to=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johan@herland.net \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
--cc=tmz@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.