From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, tytso@mit.edu,
jlayton@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com,
ffilz@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, agruen@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] ext4: Update richacl incompat flag value
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:41:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100201234130.GW19418@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265002505-8387-17-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:04:58AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Update the incompat flag value so that we don't
> conflict with ext4 features which are not yet
> upstream but are in use.
In general, for any patches that just fix problems in preceding patches,
could you just fold those into the preceding patches?
--b.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 13df624..bcbff59 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1133,7 +1133,9 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP 0x0100
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG 0x0200
> -#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RICHACL 0x0400
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE 0x0400
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RICHACL 0x0800
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DIRDATA 0x1000
>
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_SUPP EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP (EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE| \
> --
> 1.7.0.rc0.48.gdace5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-01 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 5:34 [RFC PATCH] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 01/23] vfs: VFS hooks for per-filesystem permission models Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 02/23] vfs: Check for create permission during rename Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 03/23] vfs: rich ACL in-memory representation and manipulation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 7:28 ` Brad Boyer
2010-02-01 18:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-01 23:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-01 23:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 04/23] richacl: Add write retention and retention hold access mask Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 05/23] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 06/23] vfs: Implement those parts of Automatic Inheritance (AI) which are safe under POSIX Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 07/23] vfs: Add Posix acl to rich acl mapping helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 23:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 5:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 08/23] vfs: Add a flag to denote posix mapped richacl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 23:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 5:33 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-02 15:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 15:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 09/23] ext4: Add posix acl to rich acl mapping Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 10/23] richacl: Add separate file and dir acl masks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 11/23] richacl: Move the xattr representation to little-endian format Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 23:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-02 5:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 12/23] richacl: Use directory specific mask values for operation on directories Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 13/23] richacl: Follow nfs4 acl delete definition Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 14/23] richacl: Disable automatic inheritance with posix mapped acls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 15/23] richacl: Delete posix acl if present on richacl set Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 16/23] ext4: Update richacl incompat flag value Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 23:41 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2010-02-01 5:34 ` [PATCH 17/23] vfs: Add new MS_ACL and MS_RICHACL flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 18/23] richacl: Add helper function for creating richacl from mode values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 19/23] fs: Use the correct MS_*ACL flags in file system code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 20/23] nfsd: Apply NFSv4acl to posix acl mapping only if MS_POSIXACL is set Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 21/23] richacl: Add helpers for NFSv4 acl to richacl conversion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 22/23] nfsd: Add support for reading rich acl from file system Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-02-01 5:35 ` [PATCH 23/23] nfsd: Add support for saving richacl Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100201234130.GW19418@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.