From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6][cr-tests]: eclone-4: Fail if clone_flags_high is non-zero Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:05:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20100202210551.GC32305@us.ibm.com> References: <20100202193508.GA8542@us.ibm.com> <20100202193931.GC8793@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100202193931.GC8793-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:10:32 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH 4/6][cr-tests]: eclone-4: Fail if clone_flags_high is non-zero > > To ensure future extendability, we want the unused fields to be 0. Ensure > eclone() fails if ->clone_flags_high field is non-0. > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > + ca.clone_flags_high = (u64)1 << 33; So have you tested this on x86-32? does it pass? -serge