From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] Hybrid extension support in Xen Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:22:18 +0800 Message-ID: <201002022222.18846.sheng@linux.intel.com> References: <201002021616.19189.sheng@linux.intel.com> <1265118605.2965.23089.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20100202140047.GB7099@whitby.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100202140047.GB7099@whitby.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tim Deegan Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:00:47 Tim Deegan wrote: > At 13:50 +0000 on 02 Feb (1265118605), Ian Campbell wrote: > > I wonder if we could turn things around and have the guest pick some > > pages and tell the hypervisor to put the grant table there, removing the > > need to reserve any of the physical address space up front. > > Yes; this is how all existing PV-on-HVM drivers work, using the > grant-table hypercall. I don't see the need to add another mechanism. ...Not quite understand. I think the PV-on-HVM drivers reserved the memory space in QEmu provided device's MMIO space, similar to what I did here(except reserved in BIOS)?... -- regards Yang, Sheng