All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfs: move the inode locking outside xfs_fsync()
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:07:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100204160752.GA11206@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100203230833.GC5332@discord.disaster>

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:08:33AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:29:17AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:25:02AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > We have a need for a delayed write inode flush operation
> > > to be made atomically with an fsync to avoid physically
> > > writing inodes but still keeping inode buffer information
> > > up to date for bulkstat.
> > > 
> > > Move the inode locking outside xfs_fsync() to allow this to
> > > be done.
> > 
> > What's the point of the lock_flags argument?  It should always
> > be IOLOCK_SHARED, so instead of passing it in as an argument
> > I'd rather add an assert to enforce it.
> 
> Fair enough. Updated patch below.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> 
> xfs: move the inode locking outside xfs_fsync() V2
> 
> We have a need for a delayed write inode flush operation
> to be made atomically with an fsync to avoid physically
> writing inodes but still keeping inode buffer information
> up to date for bulkstat.
> 
> Move the inode locking outside xfs_fsync() to allow this to
> be done.
> 
> Version 2
> - kill the lock_flags argument and simply assert XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED
>   in xfs_fsync().

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-04 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-02 23:24 [PATCH 0/10] Delayed write metadata writeback V4 Dave Chinner
2010-02-02 23:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: Make inode reclaim states explicit Dave Chinner
2010-02-05 19:06   ` Alex Elder
2010-02-06  0:07     ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-02 23:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: Use delayed write for inodes rather than async V2 Dave Chinner
2010-02-03 11:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-05 21:38   ` Alex Elder
2010-02-02 23:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: Don't issue buffer IO direct from AIL push V2 Dave Chinner
2010-02-05 22:51   ` Alex Elder
2010-02-02 23:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: Sort delayed write buffers before dispatch Dave Chinner
2010-02-05 23:53   ` Alex Elder
2010-02-02 23:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: Use delay write promotion for dquot flushing Dave Chinner
2010-02-05 23:55   ` Alex Elder
2010-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: kill the unused XFS_QMOPT_* flush flags V2 Dave Chinner
2010-02-03 11:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: remove invalid barrier optimization from xfs_fsync Dave Chinner
2010-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: move the inode locking outside xfs_fsync() Dave Chinner
2010-02-03 11:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-03 23:08     ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-04 16:07       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: xfs_fs_write_inode() can fail to write inodes synchronously V2 Dave Chinner
2010-02-03 11:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-03 18:07     ` bpm
2010-02-03 20:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-03 20:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-03 23:02       ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-04 17:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-02 23:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: kill xfs_bawrite Dave Chinner
2010-02-03 11:19   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100204160752.GA11206@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.