From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: c/r rebase to 2.6.33-rc5 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:57:22 -0600 Message-ID: <20100205145722.GA6685@us.ibm.com> References: <4B6B04E7.9080704@cs.columbia.edu> <20100205014009.GA5474@us.ibm.com> <4B6C2EFA.3050703@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B6C2EFA.3050703-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > > > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org): > >> I rebased the most recent patchset to 2.6.33, and pushed to > >> ckpt-v19-rc2.10. only x86-32 is (lightly) tested. > >> > >> it does not include patches from 1/27 and on. working on it > >> now. > >> > >> please review: > >> > >> * arch-specific parts that I didn't screw up anything. > >> btw, I moved checkpoint code from mm/ to kernel/ > >> > >> * [dan] network: net/checkpoint.c now uses sock_alloc_file(); > >> there may or may not be a leak of sock_hold(). > >> > >> * [serge] selinux now auto-generates some include files, see > >> the changes to classmap.h > >> > >> Oren. > > > > For x86-64, I needed the following patch. With this patch, only > > the fileio and futex tests failed. Suka is looking into the fileio > > failure - Matt you might check the futex tests on whatever arch > > you have available... > > > > For s390, I of course still need > > "fix 31-bit s390 checkpoint/restart wrappers" for compile with > > CONFIG_COMPAT to succeed. > > Ok, fixed, and pushed to ckpt-v19-rc2.10. > If this is more or less ok, I'll change it to ckpt-v19-rc3 :) My git tree isn't happy with whatever rebasing you did. Can you push a ckpt-v19-rc2.11 tag or just ckpt-v19-rc3? I haven't looked at the selinux issue at all yet btw, and I'd like to hear if anyone has figured out the issue with a pipe being treated as Unlinked file in the robust futex testcase. Matt? -serge