All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Raffeiner <sturmflut@lieberbiber.de>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Cc: Andrey Yurovsky <andrey@cozybit.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: allow adding new station to devices in mesh mode
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:04:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002052004.06220.sturmflut@lieberbiber.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100205175556.GC1496@holoscopio.com>

Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 18:55:56 schrieb Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo:

> I did not get automatic plinks for a peer.

The last time that happened I was using different checkouts of wireless-testing 
on both nodes and somebody had changed the code to match a new draft version 
in between.

And the one time before that there was a bug in the ath5k code, effectively 
preventing the device from beaconing.


> I want automatic plinks to work. But since I've started to play with it,
> why not make the command just work. It's there. If adding plinks
> manually to mesh nodes is not permitted, I may just send another patch,
> disallowing it entirely and making it explicit in code, comment and git
> log.

If I'm not mistaken the draft standard says that every node has to actively or 
passively scan for neighbors and automatically select candidate peers. A 
candidate peer has to announce a profile (Mesh Information Element) in its 
beacons that matches the local profile.

If manual addition of plinks is allowed you could theoretically force your 
node to peer with a neighbor running a different profile, e.g. using a different 
path selection or authentication algorithm, or an implementation based on a 
different draft version.

I can't really think of an use for it.

Just my 0.01$.

regards
Simon Raffeiner

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-05 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-05  1:00 [PATCH] nl80211: allow adding new station to devices in mesh mode Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-02-05  9:39 ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-05  9:59   ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-05 16:57 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-02-05 17:47   ` Andrey Yurovsky
2010-02-05 17:55     ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-02-05 19:04       ` Simon Raffeiner [this message]
2010-02-05 23:16         ` Andrey Yurovsky
2010-02-06  8:59     ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-07 19:51       ` Andrey Yurovsky
2010-02-08  9:08         ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-08 19:25           ` Javier Cardona
2010-02-08 20:26             ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-02-09  7:58               ` Johannes Berg
2010-02-08 13:54         ` Simon Raffeiner
2010-02-08 17:26           ` Javier Cardona

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002052004.06220.sturmflut@lieberbiber.de \
    --to=sturmflut@lieberbiber.de \
    --cc=andrey@cozybit.com \
    --cc=cascardo@holoscopio.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.