From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752202Ab0BHUt6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:49:58 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46234 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751900Ab0BHUt5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:49:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:48:45 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Minchan Kim Cc: Len Brown , inux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: [BUG?] recursive locking in acpi_bus_register_driver Message-Id: <20100208124845.f652e951.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <28c262361002042258v7a7b8e87y3e376eaeb152b608@mail.gmail.com> References: <28c262361002042258v7a7b8e87y3e376eaeb152b608@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:58:07 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > Is this a known bug or my hardware is bad ? > I use mmotm 2010-02-03-20-09. > > I didn't have a problem in 2.6.32. > Unfortunately I can't test it at next week. > I hope this problem can be reproduced easily. > It would be useful if you could work out whether this bug is only in -mm, or is in linux-next or is in mainline, please. Probably it's in linux-next, and it might be due to driver core changes or acpi changes. Either way, we should get this weeded out lest the offending code turns up in 2.6.34-rc1.