From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH? process_32.c:__switch_to() calls __math_state_restore() before updating current_task
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:26:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100208202652.GA27043@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265654890.2843.27.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
On 02/08, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 04:44 -0800, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Could you please explain me another issue? I know nothing about fpu
> > handling, I am reading this code trying to understand the unrelated
> > bug with the old kernel.
> >
> > In short: why restore_i387_xstate() does init_fpu() when !used_math(),
> > can't (or shouldn't) it merely do set_used_math() ?
> >
> > restore_i387_xstate:
> >
> > if (!used_math()) {
> > err = init_fpu(tsk);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > note that buf != NULL. This means that used_math() was true when
> > get_sigframe() was called, otherwise buf == sigcontext->fpstate
> > would be NULL, right?
>
> No. When the signal is delivered sigcontext->fpstate can be null and
> when we return from the signal handler, user can update the
> sigcontext->fpstate pointer
Yes, I already realized this, see my next emails.
> and the user expects the kernel to update
> the fpstate of the process accordingly.
but I didn't know it is "officially" allowed to populate .xstate
this way.
Thanks Suresh for your explanations.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-04 16:51 PATCH? process_32.c:__switch_to() calls __math_state_restore() before updating current_task Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-04 17:40 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-05 12:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-06 12:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-06 12:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-08 18:48 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-08 20:26 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100208202652.GA27043@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.