From: Jakob Sandgren <jakob@southpole.se>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Poor performane (idle cpu) [SOLVED; problem with "pv"]
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100209144829.GA4211@southpole.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100209002806.GA14310@tansi.org>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Arno Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:54:16AM +0100, Jakob Sandgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > (please keep me on CC since I'm not subscribed yet)
> >
> > To me it seems like there is some serious flaw within kcryptd that
> > ends up to wait for "something" instead of sending enough requests to
> > the disks to make sure it has data to decrypt. What do you think?
>
> The same thing.
>
> Here is a reference test (I have notebook disks in this server):
>
> Raw read: 54MB/s 14% CPU
> Read with decrypt: 53MB/s 65% CPU
For reference this is the exact output of my benchmark, maybe there
are some difference in setup or benchmark?
OOOOOooops! While putting toghether this information I actually found
the cause of the problem, it was my benchark that was wrong!
This was the benchmark I used to get the performance was:
dd if=/dev/mapper/bench1 bs=4M iflag=direct |pv | dd of=/dev/null
and the number reported by "pv" during the run was ~75MB/s and dd
reported the same number when finished.
Changing this to:
dd if=/dev/mapper/bench1 bs=4M iflag=direct of=/dev/null count=1000
gave a more correct number; 125MB/s
I was not aware of that piping the data through pv would cause such a
big degradation in performance.
> That would mean the crypto is pretty slow on your new CPU.
> As a reference, my 53MB/s at 65% CPU is on an 2800MHz Athlon
> 64 X2 5600+ with aes-cbc-plain.
>
> Here is an OpenSSL crypto speed test:
> openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc
> [...]
> The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
> type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
> aes-256-cbc 71848.00k 98649.49k 110187.78k 113646.25k 114666.15k
>
> You might want to compare this with the numbers on your CPU.
The numbers from my system (Core I7) are below
root@mvh:~# openssl speed -evp aes-256-cbc
...
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-256-cbc 110769.28k 118629.67k 120600.15k 121138.86k 121206.10k
I has now been able to get a 175MB/sec from my main raid partition.
Best Regards,
Jakob
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-08 1:16 [dm-crypt] Poor performane (idle cpu) Jakob Sandgren
2010-02-08 1:50 ` Arno Wagner
2010-02-08 23:54 ` Jakob Sandgren
2010-02-09 0:28 ` Arno Wagner
2010-02-09 14:48 ` Jakob Sandgren [this message]
2010-02-09 16:14 ` [dm-crypt] Poor performane (idle cpu) [SOLVED; problem with "pv"] Arno Wagner
2010-02-09 16:16 ` M Thomas Frederiksen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100209144829.GA4211@southpole.se \
--to=jakob@southpole.se \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.