From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755315Ab0BKPw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:52:26 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50300 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753075Ab0BKPwY (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:52:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:52:04 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Jean Delvare , LKML , Tejun Heo , Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: sysfs_sd_setattr set iattrs unconditionally Message-ID: <20100211155204.GB24191@suse.de> References: <20100120131602.12aa48f7@hyperion.delvare> <20100120160008.7d59688b@hyperion.delvare> <20100122041913.GC4302@suse.de> <20100203091138.1ababf5e@hyperion.delvare> <20100203142218.GA27676@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:33:29AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Greg I think this patch has slipped through the cracks. > Do I need to resend this regression fix or send it directly to Linus? > > chmod and friends have been broken on sysfs since 2.6.32... Sorry, I was travelling last week, it's still in my queue, I'll get it to Linus soon. thanks, greg k-h