All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	aris@redhat.com, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nmi_watchdog: use a boolean config flag for compiling
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:45:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100215184502.GN3062@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100215182117.GC5119@lenovo>

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:21:17PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:13:01PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> ...
> > > Looking through the code, is there ever case where 'apic' is undefined?
> > > The arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace should match identically to the old nmi
> > > code, so I am stuck on how to fix this.
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?
> > > 
> > 
> > It looks familiar to one problem with HW breakpoints "Kconfig select"
> > issue Frederic fixed once not that long ago, if I recall correctly.
> > 
> > So due to select we choose to compile hw_nmi.c, but CONFIG_LOCAL_APIC
> > (or APIC on UP) is turned off. So apic.c is not compiled. And at stage
> > of linking we get unresolved symbol.


Hmm thanks for the feedback.  The code can handle CONFIG_LOCAL_APIC being
turned off.  I'll look more at the UP stuff.

> > 
> > I don't remember the details how Frederic fixed HW breakpoints "select"
> > issue, CC'ed :) But you may google to find it out.
> >
> 
> Here is what I mean http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67973/

I don't believe I have the same issue.  Thanks for the pointer.

Cheers,
Don

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-15 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-12 22:19 [PATCH 1/4] nmi_watchdog: use a boolean config flag for compiling Don Zickus
2010-02-12 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] nmi_watchdog: compile and portability fixes Don Zickus
2010-02-14  9:13   ` [tip:perf/nmi] nmi_watchdog: Compile " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-02-12 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] nmi_watchdog: fallback to software events when no hardware pmu detected Don Zickus
2010-02-14  9:13   ` [tip:perf/nmi] nmi_watchdog: Fallback " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-02-15  0:33   ` [PATCH 3/4] nmi_watchdog: fallback " Paul Mackerras
2010-02-15 15:38     ` Don Zickus
2010-02-12 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] [RFC][powerpc] nmi_watchdog: support for powerpc Don Zickus
2010-02-14  9:12 ` [tip:perf/nmi] nmi_watchdog: Use a boolean config flag for compiling tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-02-14 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] nmi_watchdog: use " Ingo Molnar
2010-02-14 18:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-15 23:02     ` Don Zickus
2010-02-15 17:51   ` Don Zickus
2010-02-15 18:13     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-15 18:21       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-15 18:45         ` Don Zickus [this message]
2010-02-16 14:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-18 19:27       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100215184502.GN3062@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.