From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:45:58 +0100 Message-ID: <201002152145.58184.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <4un6Gst5rKB.A.Im.WkIeLB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Christian Casteyde , Linus Torvalds , Tejun Heo , Greg Kroah-Hartman On Monday 15 February 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde > > Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) > > I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 > > It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically > allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise > it seems to be working well. > > Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing > in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Great, I'm glad that these issues are being worked on. Thanks for the information. Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932074Ab0BOUpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:45:16 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36380 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755759Ab0BOUpM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:45:12 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:45:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.33-rc8-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , "Christian Casteyde" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Tejun Heo" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" References: <4un6Gst5rKB.A.Im.WkIeLB@chimera> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002152145.58184.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 15 February 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde > > Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) > > I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 > > It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically > allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise > it seems to be working well. > > Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing > in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Great, I'm glad that these issues are being worked on. Thanks for the information. Rafael