From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:16:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100218161637.GP22141@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7D4368.6020903@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/18/2010 01:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
> >shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
> >which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
> >nested_svm_map.
> >
> >
> >
> >-static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
> >+static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr)
> > {
> > struct page *page;
> >
> >@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
> >
> > page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
> >
> >- kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
> >+ kunmap(addr);
> > kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
> > }
>
> kunmap() takes a struct page *, not the virtual address (a
> consistent source of bugs).
Ah true, thanks. I'll fix that.
> kmap() is generally an unloved interface, it is slow and possibly
> deadlock prone, but it's better than sleeping in atomic context. If
> you can hack your way around it, that is preferred.
Best would be to use kvm_read_guest, but I fear that this will have an
performance impact. Maybe I'll try this and measure if it really has a
significant performance impact.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:16 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100218161637.GP22141@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.