From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <lists@egidy.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:40:21 +0000
Subject: public code repository (was Re: [PATCH] add MIME-aware footers)
Message-Id: <201002190940.21471.lists@egidy.de>
List-Id: <mlmmj.mlmmj.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org

On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:54:43 Mads Martin J=F8rgensen wrote:
> On 18/02/2010, at 18.22, Morten Shearman Kirkegaard wrote:
> >> BTW, is the CVS available to the public somewhere?
> >
> > Not at the moment, but if you drop Mads Martin a mail, you might be able
> > to convince him to create an account for you.
>=20
> I would much rather someone converted it to something and put it somewhere
>  :)

I would much rather decide what something should be before starting to conv=
ert=20
;)

I'd vote for git and I can offer to convert the history from cvs to git. Bu=
t=20
I'm just occasionally sending a patch so my preferences should not count so=
=20
much. Mostly the maintainer should be comfortable with the "something" chos=
en.

I've made good experience with git. But when deciding where to host it, you=
=20
should check if you can give commit rights to others and how hard it is to =
do=20
so.

I'm hosting some projects on our own server:=20
http://developer.intra2net.com/git/

But it took a while to set it up so that others can commit, but just to the=
=20
specific projects they are allowed to.

I'm also working with a project hosted on github.com. It's very easy to giv=
e=20
rights to others. It's even more easy to merge some specific patches someon=
e=20
else has done. So I'd recommend to use github.

Kind regards,

Gerd

--=20
Address (better: trap) for people I really don't want to get mail from:
jonas@cactusamerica.com