From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani@redhat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:41:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100219174150.GD4921@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100219085831.GA10837@in.ibm.com>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 02:28:31PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:00:01PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > index 017d937..0c1033d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static unsigned long ptrace_get_debugreg(struct task_struct *tsk, int n)
> > } else if (n == 6) {
> > val = thread->debugreg6;
> > } else if (n == 7) {
> > - val = ptrace_get_dr7(thread->ptrace_bps);
> > + val = thread->ptrace_dr7;
>
> Some more comments that I missed out in the previous mail...
>
> Shouldn't ptrace_get_dr7() function be entirely removed now, given that
> its only caller no longer invokes it?
>
> > }
> > return val;
> > }
> > @@ -778,8 +778,11 @@ int ptrace_set_debugreg(struct task_struct *tsk, int n, unsigned long val)
> > return rc;
> > }
> > /* All that's left is DR7 */
> > - if (n == 7)
> > + if (n == 7) {
> > rc = ptrace_write_dr7(tsk, val);
>
> And ptrace_write_dr7() should be made to populate thread->ptrace_dr7 if
> it is going to return a success.
>
> > + if (!rc)
> > + thread->ptrace_dr7 = val;
> > + }
> >
> > ret_path:
> > return rc;
> > --
> > 1.6.2.3
> >
>
> Thanks,
> K.Prasad
>
This is urgent so I'm pushing the two patches right away as they fix the
regression and are not intrusive.
Let's further improve that later, for a merge window, ok?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 16:33 Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1 Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-11 18:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-11 19:49 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-12 18:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-13 17:33 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-13 21:29 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-14 17:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-14 20:13 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-14 20:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-14 23:05 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-15 11:57 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-15 15:57 ` Alexandre Julliard
2010-02-15 19:37 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-15 19:47 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-17 16:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-17 17:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 17:59 ` Regression in ptrace (Wine) starting with 2.6.33-rc1, fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 19:27 ` Michael Stefaniuc
2010-02-18 19:41 ` Alexandre Julliard
2010-02-19 17:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-18 21:16 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-19 17:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:51 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:45 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 15:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:58 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 8:58 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 15:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 17:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-02-19 18:04 ` K.Prasad
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [GIT PULL] hw-breakpoint regression fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-22 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address Frederic Weisbecker
2010-02-19 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100219174150.GD4921@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=julliard@winehq.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=maneesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mstefani@redhat.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.