From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nixbw-0002mz-Tv for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:15:40 +0000 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1Nixbv-00038I-DP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:15:40 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:10:51 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20100220191051.GA19560@localhost.localdomain> References: <20100220143359.GD3000@hack> <20100220150936.GP30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100220151605.GQ30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100220151605.GQ30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [Patch] um: tell git to ignore generated files List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Al Viro Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, Andrew Morton , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:16:05PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:09:36PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:33:59PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote: > > > > > > git should ignore these files, since they are generated. > > > > > +include/shared/kern_constants.h > > > +include/shared/user_constants.h > > > > I have patches taking that to include/generated, actually > > BTW, what's the status of skas4? I have a series of patches leading towards > resurrection of uml/powerpc (skas0), but I'd rather avoid breaking skas4 > in process... Where does the recent version of that thing live? TBH, I haven't done any real work in UML in the last year or so. The world has pretty much passed UML by, and it's beyond my capabilities and time to catch up and keep up. So, to answer the question, I'd say that skas4 is in the same boat. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel