From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com ([209.85.218.213]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Njgzq-0005BU-QT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:43:25 +0100 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2021595bwz.12 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YBJVV1ZZMUx3BIpc9xkUooL2bgspPpZBoCodnrpeCkA=; b=Syp/luTVYP3hzzLlPvkgfajwFAZUu6KTAqbZzHxpqeHvbw1j5LzfMotgjLS4YGrLLJ C6ZieduIHByN+1FfjaxEQiTlrY0rFTpYvYo3NAUgEu9B38rE4pmBPqNPn1QsywhfI0ZV EVNFpjpl5dxlph0shtsUWbnfv2jaXx2PtlsuE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=uerX5piVvwl9NAyrsQfaPaoiIRRsR6m2Ge7BJgs431ESJ4WwwvpJMkOnLRpNW+IL2w SiNI50AenF6kVGdFFNrbFwVPtO5YqJWlqmFSFZbmd90fMXtU6OjiFpdF3YsIV+R7vN+i SDr6dm3v6z+AANkTLz5Rq0exCAh3XxZt1rJlI= Received: by 10.204.132.131 with SMTP id b3mr1697778bkt.135.1266878438626; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from s42.loc ([84.119.103.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1416411bwz.2.2010.02.22.14.40.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from cow by s42.loc with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Njh27-0003hy-Kh; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:45:43 +0100 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:45:43 +0100 From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100222224543.GD30265@mx.loc> References: <1266766352-28786-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> <20100222162424.GA27420@denix.org> <1266857709.14566.348.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <20100222181754.GB24049@jama> <20100222194159.GZ30265@mx.loc> <20100222214335.GB30265@mx.loc> <20100222220621.GB27420@denix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100222220621.GB27420@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.218.213 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] git: add SRC_URI name X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:43:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:06:21PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> Not using "archive" as Martin likes as default, but uri%d, but > >For multiple SRC_URIs, using uri1/uri2 can be more confusing and may be not >much better than looking up real names in .inc file... ok, so let's drop that superfluous .note and the url%d handling. Other opinions?