From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Benjamin S." <sbenni@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:23:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223122320.GZ1025@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002231317.01128.bzolnier@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 23 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means
> > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening
> > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding
> > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees
> > >
> > >
> > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance.
> > >
> > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree
> > > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not
> > > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ]
> >
> > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of
> > political tirades?
>
> I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus'
> tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix
> for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my
> personal perspective in waiting for such long time..
It'll go into 2.6.33, I already prepared an updated for-linus branch
this morning and will send it out later today.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 21:24 [git patch] atang tree: fix 2.6.32 SSD performance regression Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-23 6:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 12:17 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-23 12:23 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-02-23 12:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100223122320.GZ1025@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbenni@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.