All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bpm@sgi.com
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: socket buffer size module parameter
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:12:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223161224.GG10942@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B833056.8020703@oracle.com>

Hey Chuck,

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:33:10PM -0800, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 02/22/2010 01:54 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
>> +int            tcp_rcvbuf_nrpc = 6;
>
> Just curious, is this '6' a typo?

Not a typo.  The original setting for tcp receive buffer was hardcoded
at

3 (in svc_tcp_init and svc_tcp_recv_record)
	*
sv_max_mesg
	*
2 (in svc_sock_setbufsize)
	
That's where I came up with the 6 for the tcp recv buffer.  The setting
hasn't changed.



The UDP send/recv buffer settings and TCP send buffer settings were
going to be

( 4 (default number of kernel threads on sles11)
	+
3 (as in svc_udp_recvfrom, etc) )
	*
sv_max_mesg
	* 
2 (in svc_sock_setbufsize)

but 14 wasn't a very round number, so I went with 16 which also happened
to match the slot_table_entries default.

> Perhaps it would be nice to have a  
> single macro defined as the default value for all of these.
>
> Do we have a high degree of confidence that these new default settings  
> will not adversely affect workloads that already perform well?

This patch has been in several releases of SGI's nfsd respin and I've
heard nothing to suggest there is an issue.  I didn't spend much time
taking measurements on UDP and didn't keep my TCP measurements.  If you
feel measurements are essential I'll be happy to provide a few, but
won't be able to get around to it for a little while.

Thanks,
	Ben

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-23 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-22 21:54 [PATCH 0/2] knfsd: support larger numbers of clients Ben Myers
2010-02-22 21:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] knfsd: nfsd_max_connections module parameter Ben Myers
2010-02-22 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: socket buffer size " Ben Myers
2010-02-23  1:33   ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-23 16:12     ` bpm [this message]
2010-02-23 20:09       ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-23 20:48         ` bpm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100223161224.GG10942@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.