From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Prendel Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:24:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Add the sensors-config tool Message-Id: <20100224202427.GA1914@andre-laptop> List-Id: References: <20100219193821.GA1917@andre-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20100219193821.GA1917@andre-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:58:56PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > Having multiple directory levels is fine by me. I was merely > pointing out that there are some issues with that approach. > > Thinking of this another possible issue is that vendors don't > always use the same vendor string in the DMI data. > > So I think that the following would be a good solution: > > 1 dir per vendor, with vendor board configs in there, just like > the wiki. > > symlinks in the base dir following the symlink structure I suggested > earlier. > > This way we get the best of both worlds I think. Sounds good. I will take some time to revise the tool and come with an updated version. > Regards, > > Hans Thanks, Andre _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors