From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkOML-0006Om-2R for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:01:33 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.251.51.225]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KYD00A7I69UVEEA@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:58:43 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73FE414AF60; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:58:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:58:42 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko In-reply-to: <6ec4247d0911181455g6399eeeci38db4e9b727886d@mail.gmail.com> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20100224205842.GC9601@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <4B03CBF0.5010000@SSpaeth.de> <4B03CDD9.1010202@SSpaeth.de> <6ec4247d0911181320o1aae5e21o2f6a8038daff6173@mail.gmail.com> <1258582348.25369.689.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <6ec4247d0911181455g6399eeeci38db4e9b727886d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS is broken (opkg issue) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:01:33 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:25:06AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote: > 2009/11/19 Phil Blundell : > > > > It's meant to be handled by this chunk of code, and I'm fairly su= re that > > this used to work reliably. =A0Has that part of opkg changed rece= ntly? >=20 > Nope, no changes there. And no particularly invasive changes up to = r240. >=20 > I have some minor worries that > http://code.google.com/p/opkg/source/detail?r=3D328 will have some = non > obvious fallout. (Obviously not the issue here though) FYI, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/30417 --=20 Denys