All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	"Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make mips-linux signal frame unwinding more robust.
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:50:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100226205016.GB2630@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B881151.9070300@caviumnetworks.com>

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:22:09AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>   The current signal frame unwinding code in mips-linux-tdep.c assumes
>   a constant offset from the signal return trampoline to the signal
>   frame. The assumption does not hold for all kernels.  Specifically
>   those that have to be compiled with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR
>   set (SGI O2 for example).  In the near future, it is likely that the
>   assumption will cease to hold universally, as we are attempting to
>   move the signal return trampoline off the stack entirely.

It's funny, I thought I'd already taught GDB about the WAR workaround,
but there's no hint of it.  Your patch looks good to me.

> OK to commit?
> 
> How about on the 7.1 branch?

OK both.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

      reply	other threads:[~2010-02-26 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4B82CEC4.2010607@caviumnetworks.com>
     [not found] ` <20100225174739.GA2851@adacore.com>
2010-02-25 18:48   ` [PATCH] Make mips-linux signal frame unwinding more robust David Daney
2010-02-26 18:22     ` David Daney
2010-02-26 20:50       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100226205016.GB2630@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=dan@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.