From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][user-cr] Rename libeclone.a to libcheckpoint.a Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:44:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20100227014407.GA2652@us.ibm.com> References: <20100224083452.GB18758@us.ibm.com> <20100224083726.GF18758@us.ibm.com> <4B8842C8.9080707@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B8842C8.9080707-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: dlezcano-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Oren Laadan [orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org] wrote: > > > Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: >> From c4063a8976fd8eca9b8d62a12b95c3125c8471c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu >> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:25:36 -0800 >> Subject: [PATCH 4/4][user-cr] Rename libeclone.a to libcheckpoint.a >> >> Export app_restart() and usercr.h to user in a new library libcheckpoint.a. >> Until eclone() makes it into glibc, include eclone() also in this new library >> and remove the libeclone.a. > > I thought libeclone.a is also used by the test suite ? Yes and I have a todo in the patchset to fix cr-tests if/when we do end up changing the name. libeclone.a looks like a short-term name (if/when eclone() is merged in libc, the library is no longer required). libcheckpoint.a (or equivalent) has more long term need. If we are having a libcheckpoint, no point keeping libeclone around too ? Sukadev