From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Stephen M. Cameron" <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, james.bottomley@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, brace@beardog.cce.hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] cciss driver SCSI updates
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100228184353.GG5768@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100226220023.11979.4999.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com>
On Fri, Feb 26 2010, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> The following series mainly fixes the scsi tape code in the cciss
> driver to take advantage of more scatter gather elements, enabling
> larger transfer sizes. The first eight patches are mainly cleaning
> things up and getting ready for the 9th patch, which enables the
> SCSI half of the driver to use more than 31 scatter gather elements.
>
> I've tested on 32-bit and 64-bit systems, and written out tapes
> with block sizes up to 2Mb.
>
> These patches are vs. Jens's linux-2.6-block tree.
Thanks Stephen, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 22:01 [PATCH 0/9] cciss driver SCSI updates Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] cciss: clarify command list padding calculation Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] cciss: detect bad alignment of scsi commands at build time Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] cciss: factor out scatter gather chain block allocation and freeing Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] cciss: simplify scatter gather code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] cciss: fix scatter gather chain block dma direction kludge Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] cciss: factor out scatter gather chain block mapping code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] cciss: do not use void pointer for scsi hba data Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] cciss: eliminate unnecessary pointer use in cciss scsi code Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-26 22:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] cciss: Fix problem with scatter gather elements in the scsi half of the driver Stephen M. Cameron
2010-02-28 18:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100228184353.GG5768@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brace@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.