From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the blackfin tree
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 02:08:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100301010849.GA7210@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301120321.8851ba86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:03:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> After merging the blackfin tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:402: error: redefinition of 'arch_syscall_addr'
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:397: note: previous definition of 'arch_syscall_addr' was here
>
> Caused by commit d156d1881ea54ec609d92388601661c2679439bb ("ftrace: unify
> arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from the blackfin tree interacting
Oh, why is this patch in the blackfin tree?
> with commit e7b8e675d9c71b868b66f62f725a948047514719 ("tracing: Unify
> arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from Linus' tree.
>
> These are slightly different versions of the same patch. but merging with the blackfin tree managed to add a second copy of the above function. I have applied the following patch for today.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:09 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] blackfin: fix mismerge of kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 5 -----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> index 37ca709..cba47d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -399,11 +399,6 @@ unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr)
> return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr];
> }
>
> -unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr)
> -{
> - return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr];
> -}
> -
> int __init init_ftrace_syscalls(void)
> {
> struct syscall_metadata *meta;
Looks like the right patch yeah.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 1:03 linux-next: build failure after merge of the blackfin tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-01 1:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-03-01 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-02 9:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-03-09 14:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-03-09 22:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100301010849.GA7210@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.