All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, czoccolo@gmail.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:02:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100301080233.GO5768@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301015047.GA16630@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Currently a queue can only dispatch up to 4 requests if there are other queues.
> This isn't optimal, device can handle more requests, for example, AHCI can
> handle 31 requests. I can understand the limit is for fairness, but we could
> do a tweak: if the queue still has a lot of slice left, sounds we could
> ignore the limit. Test shows this boost my workload (two thread randread of
> a SSD) from 78m/s to 100m/s.
> Thanks for suggestions from Corrado and Vivek for the patch.

As mentioned before, I think we definitely want to ensure that we drive
the full queue depth whenever possible. I think your patch is a bit
dangerous, though. The problematic workload here is a buffered write,
interleaved with the occasional sync reader. If the sync reader has to
endure 32 requests every time, latency rises dramatically for him.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-01  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-01  1:50 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend Shaohua Li
2010-03-01  8:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-03-01  8:15   ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-01  8:19     ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-01  8:22       ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-01  8:25         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100301080233.GO5768@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.