From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nm7P9-00039T-3w for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:19:31 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.251.51.225]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KYL00KEYZQLBEB4@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:16:10 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A87614AF60; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:15:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:15:57 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20100301151557.GD15391@denix.org> References: <6ec4247d1002281340t76447b67hc0457bbf702d38b9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <6ec4247d1002281340t76447b67hc0457bbf702d38b9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:19:32 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:10:31AM +1030, Graham Gower wrote: > On 1 March 2010 06:56, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > 2010/2/28 Koen Kooi : > >> > >> But more importantly, what harm do the recipes do to you? Does it offend > >> you that there are 26 recipes? > > > > Somewhat yes. Frankly I don't see a use for 26 recipes for all kind of > > different versions, some of which are very outdated. > > What should offend you more is stuff like this: > > [grg@rak gcc]$ pwd > /home/grg/oe/openembedded/recipes/gcc > [grg@rak gcc]$ find . -name svn-updates.dpatch -exec ls -l {} \; > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.4.2/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.4.1/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.3.1/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.3.3/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.3.4/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-svn/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > -rw-r--r-- 1 grg users 17668056 2009-11-15 12:59 > ./gcc-4.3.2/debian/svn-updates.dpatch > [grg@rak gcc]$ grep svn-updates * > [grg@rak gcc]$ So, there is 125 MB wasted right there... Thanks for the heads up! :) -- Denys