From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass init argument(s) to real init
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:12:54 +0300
Message-ID: <201003012112.58174.arvidjaar@mail.ru>
References: <201001301757.49473.arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2424631.FVJS5ezRJc";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <201001301757.49473.arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <initramfs.vger.kernel.org>
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org

--nextPart2424631.FVJS5ezRJc
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday 30 of January 2010 17:57:45 Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> I was rather surprised why all my attempts to enter single user were
> not successful :) Simple patch to collect and pass to real init what
> _looks_ like init arguments.
>=20

Ping.

Was it bad, is it unnecessary?

--nextPart2424631.FVJS5ezRJc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEUEABECAAYFAkuMA6YACgkQR6LMutpd94yh5gCgvFL0/7eiBgDj+WdZ4hRDst5l
kkQAmJLaIi+5YUlbSei/Sy2M7OOlF7M=
=C32D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2424631.FVJS5ezRJc--