From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmEBk-0007Be-0a for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:34:09 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.251.51.225]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KYM008VUJVJQ601@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:31:01 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7033A14AF60; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:55 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20100301223055.GF15391@denix.org> References: <1267392928.13054.1.camel@andromeda> <19c1b8a91003011411p420a449dw3c03d03c6f5cec9a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <19c1b8a91003011411p420a449dw3c03d03c6f5cec9a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC} glib-2.0 cleanup X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:34:09 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:11:54PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer > wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 20:39 +0100 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > >> We have 26 glib-2.0 recipes (and 8 native ones). (see ls below) > >> Only a few versions are used (see also the grep below) > >> > >> for glib-2.0: > >> "2.12.12" > >> "2.16.4" > >> "2.18.3" > >> "2.20.3" > >> "2.22.1" > >> "2.22.4" > >> "2.6.4" > >> "2.8.6" > >> > >> for glib-2.0-native: > >> "2.16.1" > >> "2.18.0" > >> "2.22.1" > >> "2.22.4" > >> > >> Both include the last two versions > >> Proposal is to remove all versions that are not used. > >> > >> How do people feel about this? > > > > Sounds good to me, althoug I'd recommend not removing them but just > > moving them out of sight, i.e. in an 'old' folder. That way we could > > please both the lets-keep-everything-no-matter-how-rotten and also the > > lets-strive-for-few-high-quality recipes. > > > > FWIW I like the idea of having 'obsolete' recipes so moving them to > recipes/obsolete may not be so bad. +1 on this one, since we already have recipes/obsolete in BBMASK by default and it will reduce parse time for obsoleted recipes. And git-mv does a nice enough job of preserving commit history... -- Denys