All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: 정재훈 <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill bug fixed in rfkill_set_sw_state
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:50:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100302125003.f7919c53.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000301cab69f$ec61ad00$c5250700$%chung@samsung.com>

Suitable cc's (from scripts/get_maintainer.pl) added.

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:55:31 +0900
_________ <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:

> Don___t work expected operation in __rfkill_set_sw_state. 
> when rfkill initialized. Rfkill___s blocked & unblocked is operating on the
> contrary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> 
> ---
>  net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
> index c224cb2..dcc2d38 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/core.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void __rfkill_set_sw_state(struct rfkill
> *rfkill, bool blocked)
>  	if (rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_SETCALL)
>  		bit = RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_PREV;
>  
> -	if (blocked)
> +	if (!blocked)
>  		rfkill->state |= bit;
>  	else
>  		rfkill->state &= ~bit;

Are you sure?  What problems were you observing with the existing code?
Please fully describe your hardware and the driver's behaviour.

The current code _looks_ OK to me.  If bool `blocked' is true, we set
the RFKILL_BLOCK_SW bit?


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-02 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-26  4:55 [PATCH] rfkill bug fixed in rfkill_set_sw_state 정재훈
2010-03-02 20:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-03-03  0:47   ` Jaehoon Chung
2010-03-03  9:37     ` Alan Jenkins
2010-03-03 10:14       ` Jaehoon Chung
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-25  4:26 정재훈

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100302125003.f7919c53.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.