From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: Which VCS besides git?
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:28:21 -0800
Message-ID: <20100302152821.GD28997@spearce.org>
References: <201003021455.52483.karlis.repsons@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: K??rlis Repsons <karlis.repsons@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 02 16:28:30 2010
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1NmU1N-0007OT-UI
	for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:28:30 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752489Ab0CBP2Z (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:28:25 -0500
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.221.179]:35565 "EHLO
	mail-qy0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751131Ab0CBP2Y (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:28:24 -0500
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so165792qyk.5
        for <git@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.227.83 with SMTP id iz19mr2938641qcb.44.1267543704007;
        Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (george.spearce.org [209.20.77.23])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm4188138iwn.0.2010.03.02.07.28.22
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201003021455.52483.karlis.repsons@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/141400>

K??rlis Repsons <karlis.repsons@gmail.com> wrote:
> which VCS besides git provide chaining of commits with help of some 
> cryptographic hash function, warning about or not allowing commits to be 
> deleted on an equivalent of pull action, so that all added pieces of data can 
> be retained securely on client side?

Most of the distributed VCS systems do this.  I know Mercurial is
functionally identical to Git in this regard.  Maybe even Monotone
and Bazaar are as well, but I'm less familiar with those.

-- 
Shawn.