From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.220.220]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmpEA-0005mw-Be for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:07:06 +0100 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so1443504fxm.12 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:04:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LEEWcJ1hV5DxOJ5YZvjGDiQClAMRaQMSwy+UVSiXDcc=; b=QBfJWb0j9yISTnMso0McwRo4MvNn/CbjqCrAHMxDoeHGuJXi81WWvPjUxdW3/+C5oE 4u+7uJrybjYSCTRWQK3ot3i7X8+bxEuNrV9dzGRM3dw3QAGk/P7icXTxD9uh97Wo3KxE ipSFoZhPq/ZGSYKmJflQRX7Km60pDkGGiDcco= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=mPdkstFubZfVgpEVnQAForVJ1VnrXP2a31k70IQe8+RLFezen/K7hXyBfPU5YCb7YX zTi0MAtBIZL2fCmQC1eeZCSY9+bR3RPtJxv9hoBtVodDvI2razy15wQ+VhpIUxHQjvtq Rvs4RVXg3fA0u32BxH+g3WQBjh/bnP3bJN3Xk= Received: by 10.87.20.13 with SMTP id x13mr110686fgi.67.1267625053977; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:04:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3638097fxm.10.2010.03.03.06.04.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:04:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:04:44 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100303140444.GP3206@jama> References: <1267616149.2259.4.camel@rex> <1267624062.2259.58.camel@rex> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1267624062.2259.58.camel@rex> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.220 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: TSC Meeting 2010/03/02 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:07:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:47:42PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > I have considered converting some of the others to new staging. > > Actually I even started it, but soon stopped with it for the following > > reasons: > > - the actual verification process is fairly cumbersome. (5) diff the 2 > > packaged-staging recipes (which I read as packaged-staging packages as > > there are no packaged-staging recipes) is imho a pita) > > It would be better to have some kind of automated way of doing this I > agree. Its technically possible, just nobody has found the time needed > to implement it. We're all volunteers as you point out. Today while checking diff of pango and libxml I noticed that bumping PR/INC_PR to target value before building it the old way helps a lot. Even the binaries were a bit different when they were built from different workdir because of PR (probably because of unstripped data in workdir/image). So now I first bump PR/INC_PR to target combination, then build without BBCLASSEXTEND without rm_work inherit or -c build, backup workdir, make BBCLASSEXTEND change, -c clean, -c build, and diff -rq workdir with backuped version. If it's different only in temp/run* temp/log* then it's great :). But usually static libs are still a bit different but probably in harmless way. Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa