From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Octeon: Register EEPROM device on the I2C bus Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:41:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20100305074155.GD21925@pengutronix.de> References: <1267772895-25409-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@windriver.com> <20100305071130.GB21925@pengutronix.de> <4B90B341.9000601@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B90B341.9000601-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yang Shi Cc: ddaney-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Is the use of 'eeprom' instead of 'at24' intentional? > > =20 >=20 > Unfortunately, at24 driver can't work on this board, I must use legacy > eeprom. Well, you are of course free to choose here :) I'd just be interested if there is a software limitation which prevents you= from using AT24. Because, it _should_ work with all kind of eeproms the legacy d= river deals with. Otherwise it is probably a bug which needs to be fixed. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuQtcMACgkQD27XaX1/VRvudwCcDh5SKi1uF8McyFVJphGbTzrw DyQAn3VWHIc3yopV++1OvlM+2Ixe2e1+ =YLUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:42:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:43923 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491996Ab0CEHmO (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:42:14 +0100 Received: from octopus.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnSAW-0000yI-Jh; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:41:56 +0100 Received: from wsa by octopus.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnSAV-0001lv-VB; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:41:55 +0100 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:41:55 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Yang Shi Cc: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, khali@linux-fr.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Octeon: Register EEPROM device on the I2C bus Message-ID: <20100305074155.GD21925@pengutronix.de> References: <1267772895-25409-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@windriver.com> <20100305071130.GB21925@pengutronix.de> <4B90B341.9000601@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B90B341.9000601@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wsa@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 26129 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: w.sang@pengutronix.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Is the use of 'eeprom' instead of 'at24' intentional? > > =20 >=20 > Unfortunately, at24 driver can't work on this board, I must use legacy > eeprom. Well, you are of course free to choose here :) I'd just be interested if there is a software limitation which prevents you= from using AT24. Because, it _should_ work with all kind of eeproms the legacy d= river deals with. Otherwise it is probably a bug which needs to be fixed. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuQtcMACgkQD27XaX1/VRvudwCcDh5SKi1uF8McyFVJphGbTzrw DyQAn3VWHIc3yopV++1OvlM+2Ixe2e1+ =YLUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--