From: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v5] PV extension of HVM(hybrid) in support in Xen
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:01:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003051001.11627.sheng@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100304150431.GB25801@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
On Thursday 04 March 2010 23:04:31 Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given that we now have a similar feature from Stefano I'd like to see
> them resolved into a single patchset.
I think Stefano's patch focused on pv_ops dom0? We are focused on upstream
Linux as domU...
I think we can get dom0 approach step by step.
>
> At 09:37 +0000 on 04 Mar (1267695434), Sheng Yang wrote:
> > + if (a.flags & HVM_PV_CLOCK) {
> > + d->hvm_pv_enabled |= XEN_HVM_PV_CLOCK_ENABLED;
> > + update_domain_wallclock_time(d);
> > + /* Other vcpus are adjusted during the start-up */
> > + hvm_funcs.set_tsc_offset(d->vcpu[0], 0);
> > + }
>
> This still makes no sense to me. Either it should affect the calling
> vcpu (i.e., current) or it should affect all online vcpus.
Yeah... I would make it affect the calling vcpu.
>
> Also, whatever the semantics, they should be documented in comments in
> the header file.
Sure.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 9:37 [PATCH][v5] PV extension of HVM(hybrid) in support in Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-04 15:04 ` Tim Deegan
2010-03-05 2:01 ` Sheng Yang [this message]
2010-03-05 10:40 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-05 11:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003051001.11627.sheng@linux.intel.com \
--to=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.