Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

[Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>]

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200
> > > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > After quite long period of inactivity, I updated graphical stack on my
> > > > > desktop/server.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To say the truth, I did such update about month ago, but found out that
> > > > > X refuses flatly to use DRI modules. I assumed that it was my mistake in
> > > > > compilation process (although it is automated).
> > > > 
> > > > That generally indicates a build or config problem of some kind.  Did
> > > > you ever narrow it down?
> > > Because the same compile process works now, I suspect that wasn't build
> > > failure.
> > 
> > Well something weird is going on; maybe you didn't build X after Mesa
> > or with the right Mesa includes?
> I am very sure that this issue isn't relevant now.
> 
> I do compile (libdrm, mesa, xserver, xf86-intel, and evdev driver in
> that order, compiling everything from scratch (doing git clean -dfx in
> all directories)

if you just want a working setup, perhaps you should try using
something that got (probably) tested by at least some people:
 	http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2009Q4.html
cheers,
Flo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--