From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:44:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Get TjMax value from
Message-Id: <20100308144453.GA17373@owl>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20100305153811.GB15945@owl>
In-Reply-To: <20100305153811.GB15945@owl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

On 17:19 Fri 05 Mar, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I'm not a native speaker but "assumption value" doesn't seem correct to me.
> "assumed value" maybe? Or even better (IMHO) "default value"?
> 

I meant the TjMax value may not be correct, the "default value" may mislead
the user into thinking it is correct. I googled the "assumption value", and
found they are used in some sentences, so I use them too :P


Hi Jean,

Do you have any comments on the two patches? I'll make another patch to
update documents if they are accepted.


Thanks
Huaxu

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors