From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>,
OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Gary Smith <gasmith@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] IPMI: Add parameter to limit CPU usage in kipmid
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:13:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100309121359.40766d99.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B96A633.2080207@acm.org>
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:49:07 -0600
Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Corey, Linus,
> >
> > On Wednesday 03 March 2010 05:14:38 pm Corey Minyard wrote:
> >
> >> From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
> >>
> >> In some cases kipmid can use a lot of CPU. This adds a way to tune
> >> the CPU used by kipmid to help in those cases. By setting
> >> kipmid_max_busy_us to a value between 100 and 500, it is possible to
> >> bring down kipmid CPU load to practically 0 without loosing too much
> >> ipmi throughput performance. Not setting the value, or setting the
> >> value to zero, operation is unaffected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
> >> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> >> ---
> >> This patch has been discussed quite a bit, and I believe all issues with it
> >> have been resolved. It's not great, but nobody has a better way to handle
> >> the problem.
> >>
> >
> > I still can't see this patch in Linus' tree as of 2.6.34-rc1. It has been
> > waiting for sooo long already, can we finally get it in? Linus, will you apply
> > it? Or should it go through Andrew?
> >
> It's already in Andrew's patches. It would be good if this could go in
> for 2.6.34, I think it has been through enough review and such.
yup, I have it queued for 2.6.34. -rc1 caught me napping so some
scrambling is happening.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-09 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 16:14 [PATCH 1/4] IPMI: Add parameter to limit CPU usage in kipmid Corey Minyard
2010-03-09 12:05 ` Jean Delvare
2010-03-09 19:49 ` Corey Minyard
2010-03-09 20:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100309121359.40766d99.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gasmith@redhat.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.