From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:43:52 -0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Update i_blocks in reflink operations. In-Reply-To: <1268111579-8600-1-git-send-email-tao.ma@oracle.com> References: <1268111579-8600-1-git-send-email-tao.ma@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20100310014352.GL6914@mail.oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:12:59PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: > In reflink, we need to upate i_blocks for the target inode. > > Reported-by: Jie Liu > Signed-off-by: Tao Ma > --- > fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c > index 9e96921..f4aad88 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c > @@ -4075,6 +4075,7 @@ static int ocfs2_complete_reflink(struct inode *s_inode, > OCFS2_I(t_inode)->ip_dyn_features = OCFS2_I(s_inode)->ip_dyn_features; > spin_unlock(&OCFS2_I(t_inode)->ip_lock); > i_size_write(t_inode, size); > + t_inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(t_inode); Curiously, why wouldn't it just be s_inode->i_blocks? Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #451 "Don't be afraid to say, 'I'm sorry.'" Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127